• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 125
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Off-Label Use (1494)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 10/28/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Design - the design of the mid-c system is aiming to take mainly axial forces, resulting from the load generated by the distraction of the curve and the relevant body weight.The device was tested in an axial direction and was found to be able to hold 700n load for 10 million cycles of axial load.It is thought that the reason for this breakage is side forces acting on the device.Method- the lower screw was inserted in a trajectory causing the lower part of the implant to be located above the spine instead of beside it.Misuse (men/women)- this patient was a lenke 3 case, and therefore out of the indications.Material and manufacturing- the production process and material data were reviewed and found acceptance and compliance with the product specification corrective action: the company already implemented corrective action with the following: trial tool was added to assist the surgeon in verifying that access tissue below the implant is removed.The trial use became standard practice by early 2019.Also, the company is already doing whatever possible not to allow using the device outside the approved indications, by using the ifu, training presentation, and an in-person meeting with surgeons.Risk assessment: with the present report, the company has a total of 3 cases of base breakage -complaint #, (b)(4), and the current complaint.Breakage of the implant was assessed in the product risk assessment dms-777 rev q, hazard id 1.7 and 1.8 this additional complaint does not change the probability thus the risk reminds acceptable at the time of this report (nov 2020), the company's incident rate due to the implant breakage of the base is 0.69%.The overall failure rate for this category as defined in the company clinical evaluation report , implant for any reason is 6.43%, which is well within the rate reported in the literature ( 0.2%-15.5%) ( cer dms-727 rev r).
 
Event Description
The doctor reported that an x-ray demonstrates implant breakage.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 125
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
adi prager
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key10841551
MDR Text Key216320301
Report Number3013461531-2020-00015
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
UDI-Device Identifier07290014993068
UDI-Public7290014993068
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIS
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,user facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/15/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/15/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date03/24/2022
Device Model NumberMID-C 125
Device Catalogue NumberAF125
Device Lot NumberAF 03-01-17
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/28/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured04/23/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-