• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH UNKNOWN CAGE/SPACER; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE W/INTEGRATED FIXATION, LUMBAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH UNKNOWN CAGE/SPACER; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE W/INTEGRATED FIXATION, LUMBAR Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Cyst(s) (1800)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for an unknown cage/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: tanida, s.Et al.(2016), vertebral endplate cyst as a predictor of nonunion after lumbar interbody fusion, spine, vool.41, number 20, pages e1216¿e1222 ((b)(6)).The aims of this study were (i) to investigate whether the formation of bone cysts after tlif using peek cages is a useful sign for predicting nonunion, as for titanium (ti) cages; and (ii) from the viewpoint of the formation of vertebral endplate cysts, to compare the bone union rate between ti and peek cages after tlif.From march 2005 to march 2011, 93 levels in 77 patients (36 males abd 41 females) were treated with ti cages.All ti cages were crescent shaped and included eight kidney bean mesh cages (medtronic sofamor danek, minneapolis,mn), one devex cage (depuy synthes spine, raynham, ma), and 84 boomerang ii cages (medtronic sofamor danek).Imploants used for the peek cages were from a competitor.All patients were followed up radiologically for 24 months.The article did not specify which of the devices were being used to capture the following complications: 70 of 93 levels had nonunion.Cyst sign, just before surgery, the vertebral endplate cysts were detected at 7 levels in the ti group.Cyst formation and union status at 1 year after surgery: 16 nonunion patients had true postive, 7 nonunion patients had false negative, cyst formation and union status at 2 year after surgery: 9 nonunion patients had true postive, 7 nonunion patients had false negative, this report is for a devex cage (depuy synthes spine, raynham, ma).This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).A copy of the literature article is being submitted with this medwatch.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN CAGE/SPACER
Type of Device
INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE W/INTEGRATED FIXATION, LUMBAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INT SPINE
chemin blanc 38
le locle
SZ  
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ   02400
6103142063
MDR Report Key10843605
MDR Text Key218505227
Report Number1526439-2020-02197
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OVD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/19/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/16/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/19/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-