• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBYPODJ45-A
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Deformation (2976); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/23/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Results: the pet lock was damaged on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was fractured approximately 42.0 cm from the proximal end.The pull wire was retracted from the pusher assembly distal detachment tip (ddt) and the embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.The proximal constraint sphere was intact with the embolization coil and the embolization coil had offset coil winds along its length.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned pod pc confirmed that the pusher assembly was fractured.If the pod pc is forcefully advanced against resistance, the pusher assembly may become kinked and may subsequently fracture.If the pusher assembly is fractured, and the pull wire is retracted out of the ddt, the embolization coil will detach from the pusher assembly.The root cause of resistance experienced during the procedure could not be determined.Further evaluation of the device revealed that the pet lock was damaged, and the embolization coil had offset coil winds.This damage was likely incidental to the reported complaint.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the lumbar artery using pod packing coils (pod pcs) and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).It was noted that the patient's anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, while attempting to implant the first coil, the physician encountered resistance when the distal tip of the pod pc was advanced into the middle of the lantern.Next, the pod pc pusher wire kinked and broke and the pod pc became detached in the lantern.Therefore, the pod pc was removed.The procedure was completed using seven pod pcs and one non-penumbra coil with the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD PACKING COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key10871288
MDR Text Key217391295
Report Number3005168196-2020-02040
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017662
UDI-Public00814548017662
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K170852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,10/26/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/19/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRBYPODJ45-A
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPODJ45
Device Lot NumberF97378
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/05/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received10/26/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/17/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Weight65
-
-