This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary = > according to the information provided, it was reported by the sales rep via phone that during a meniscal repair the arthroscopy pusher/cutter was not cutting anymore.The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observations confirm that the device appears worn indicating device was used, but as expected condition and the laser markings are slightly faded.When the trigger was tested, it feels rough as though the internal components are worn.When thread was loaded to test its functionality, it does not cut the thread confirming this complaint.Lot number on the device indicates this device is 10 years old and hence this failure can be attributed to normal field wear of the device from repeated use and sterilization cycles.However; this cannot be conclusive determined.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number:10g4, and no non-conformances were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|