If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.The actual device was returned for evaluation.The handpiece device was evaluated and the reported condition that the equipment did not work was not confirmed.Therefore, an assignable root cause was not determined.However, during evaluation it was observed that the device had a sticky trigger and was making excessive noise.The assignable root cause of this condition was determined to be traced to component failure due to normal wear.Udi: (b)(4).
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that during service and evaluation, it was determined that the handpiece device had a sticky trigger, was making excessive noise, moving parts of the device were not moving smoothly, and the etching was illegible.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for marking and labeling, check for free movement, and check for sticky triggers.It was noted in the service order that the equipment did not work.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention, or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|