• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS INC. SYNPLUG CEMENT RESTRICTOR; CEMENT OBTURATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS INC. SYNPLUG CEMENT RESTRICTOR; CEMENT OBTURATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 00000804020
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problem Osteolysis (2377)
Event Date 09/30/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Risk management files for the product have been updated to include the originally unidentified risk regarding the occurrence of osteolysis in some patients implanted with the biodegradable cement restrictors.Additionally, a risk benefit analysis was completed in may 2014 that concluded the overall medical benefits of the synplug products may not outweigh individual residual risk of osteolysis, primarily due to the lack of osteolysis reports for other cement restrictor types and options available to surgeon.Based on all available data at that time, no causal relationship between the use of the products and the reported instances of osteolysis could be demonstrated.To date, there are no conclusive findings from similar complaint investigations, or from technical or clinical information in the literature that proves or disproves a causal relationship between synplug® & optiplug® biodegradable cement restrictors or the materials they are manufactured with, and periprosthetic osteolysis (or fractures as a result).There is no data or findings that would suggest that only some subset of all the products manufactured might be affected.A risk/benefit analysis of two reported fractured, 57 reported osteolysis without the need for medical intervention and 100,000+ patients benefiting from a successful surgery it can be concluded that the benefit outweighs the risk.The finding of osteolysis surrounding the distal cement restrictor is unexpected, and undesirable; however, periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty is a well-known problem that is typically a multifactorial process and may be identified through routine radiographic follow-up.
 
Event Description
Report received noting osteolysis in (b)(6)-year old male patient, 10 years after index surgery.Osteolysis is noted in the area of the synplug via radiography.No loosening of prosthesis has been noted.No actions have been taken regarding the radiographic notation of osteolysis; prosthetic device remains implanted.No actions anticipated for an additional five years.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNPLUG CEMENT RESTRICTOR
Type of Device
CEMENT OBTURATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS INC.
2 goodyear, suite a
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ISOTIS ORTHOBIOLOGICS INC.
2 goodyear, suite a
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
audrey mudderman
5770 armada drive
carlsbad, CA 92008
7602165137
MDR Report Key10898206
MDR Text Key220994182
Report Number3001503333-2020-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K010840
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/24/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/24/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number00000804020
Device Lot Number200.288/B
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/28/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age68 YR
-
-