(b)(4) initial report.The appropriate device details were provided and the relevant device manufacturing records have been identified and reviewed for the cormet head.All parts associated with these records conformed to dimensional specifications, and were labeled as size 40mm.A pre-revision x ray was provided and will be reviewed.Conclusions will be provided in a supplemental report.A post-revision xray and operative notes were requested but were not available.The revision was reported to be completed successfully.The patient fells well.The activity level of the patient was reported to be high.The explanted devices will be returned to corin and will be reviewed.Conclusions will be provided in a supplemental report.Please note: this report is filed with the fda due to an adverse event experienced with a device that is similar to those placed on the market in the usa, however, this event occurred outside of the usa.
|
Per 3319 - final report the appropriate device details were provided and the relevant device manufacturing records has been identified and reviewed.All finished parts associated with these records conformed to material and dimensional specifications at the time of manufacture.As a result of investigation for removed implants, they are cormet products and the size of the cup (50mm) and the head (40mm) did not match.Originally, 44mm head should have been used for 50mm cup.It is confirmed that the size 2 head was the inappropriate size.The inappropriate cormet head size was implanted related to an external root cause.Based on this, corin now considers this case closed.Please note: this report is filled with the fda due to an adverse event experienced with a device that is similar to those placed on the market in the usa, however, this event occured outside of the usa.The submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the device, reporting entity, entity's representative or distributor caused or contributed to this event.
|