H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of midline related vein thrombosis was inconclusive due to the nature of the reported event.The product returned for evaluation was one 18ga x 10cm powerglide pro rt midline catheter.Usage residues were observed throughout the sample and the sample was received with an attached extension tube.The catheter exhibited curved shape memory but was otherwise unremarkable to gross inspection.An attempt to infuse water through the sample using a 12ml syringe revealed the sample to be patent to infusion and aspiration with no observed leaks.Microscopic inspection of the sample did not reveal any damage or deformity.No device deficiencies were discovered during evaluation of the returned sample; however, the reported event of vein thrombosis could neither be verified, nor related to the use of the implicated midline catheter.Consequently this complaint is complaint is inconclusive.H3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
|