H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, complaint and lot history review, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), labeling, applicable manufacture records, and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a damaged microintroducer is confirmed; however, the exact cause is unknown.One 4.5 fr x 7 cm microintroducer was returned for evaluation.An initial visual observation showed use residue on the returned sample.The dilator within the introducer sheath was observed to be slightly bent and curved.The distal tip of the introducer was observed to be damaged.A microscopic observation revealed one edge of the introducer sheath was buckled and flared outward with some plastic deformation of the sheath material at the corners of this buckling.While the root cause of the damage observed in the introducer sheath is unknown, possible causes include damage during handling or use.H3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
|