• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 50MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 50MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Model Number 74120150
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bacterial Infection (1735); Pain (1994); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Event Date 03/16/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Bilateral patient.Plaintiff underwent medically-indicated two-stage revision of the bhr-tha left hip implants on (b)(6) 2018.(1st stage) and (b)(6) 2018 (2nd stage).On the first stage the stem, femoral head and sleeve were removed.At the second stage the zimmer components were removed along with the bhr-tha shell.The patient revision surgery was performed due to severe pain, limited mobility, metallosis, pseudotumor formation, and elevated cobalt and chromium ion levels.No s&n parts remained implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision the stem, hemi head, modular sleeve and bhr cup were removed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.Without definitive part/lot numbers a complete complaint history review, dhr review, specific product labelling and ifu review and risk management review cannot be performed for the synergy stem, hemi head and modular sleeve.If this information becomes available at a later time, the task will be reopened and completed.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.Similar complaints have been identified for the bhr cup.This will continue to be monitored.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the bhr cup reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.It was also confirmed that all devices were sterilised through review of the dhr.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.Identified risks are reduced in severity / occurrence / detection as far as possible.The available medical documents were reviewed.For the bilateral two stage revisions; the clinical information provided, of the reported elevated metal ion levels, the pseudotumor, and the necrotic tissue may be consistent with a reaction to metal debris.However, the source and the root cause cannot be determined with the available documentation.It cannot be concluded that the reported clinical findings are associated with the implant failure versus the reported infection.The cultures that positive for bacillus species on the left and mrse on the right were likely an hematogenous infection without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventive or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional information in b5 and h6 (health effect - clinical code and health effect - impact code were updated).
 
Event Description
Bilateral patient.Plaintiff underwent medically-indicated two-stage revision of the bhr-tha right hip implants on (b)(6) 2018.(1st stage) and (b)(6) 2018 (2nd stage).On the first stage the stem, femoral head and sleeve were removed.At the second stage the zimmer components were removed along with the bhr-tha shell.The patient¿s two (2) stage revision surgery was performed due to suspected mrse hip infection, severe pain, limited mobility, metallosis, pseudotumor formation, and elevated cobalt and chromium ion levels.No s&n parts remained implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACETLR CUP HAP 50MM W/ IMPTR
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key10909172
MDR Text Key218515973
Report Number3005975929-2020-00463
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010502568
UDI-Public03596010502568
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/26/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/29/2013
Device Model Number74120150
Device Catalogue Number74120150
Device Lot Number090081
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/30/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-