• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. BIOINDUCTIVE IMPLANT W/ARTH DEL LRG; MESH, SURGICAL, COLLAGEN, ORTHOPAEDICS, REINFORCEMENT OF TENDON

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. BIOINDUCTIVE IMPLANT W/ARTH DEL LRG; MESH, SURGICAL, COLLAGEN, ORTHOPAEDICS, REINFORCEMENT OF TENDON Back to Search Results
Model Number 4566
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Blister (4537)
Event Date 11/06/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that after the bioinductive implant was implanted, the patient incision was bubbling, blistering and draining.No other complications were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10, h3, h6: the reported device, used in treatment, was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.There was a relationship found between the subject device and the reported incident.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was an isolated event.A review of the instructions for use found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.A review of the customer provided images revealed apparent blistering at the incision site of two separate patients.According to the complaint description, one implant was removed and can be seen in the images.The implant appears to have been tied with suture into a graft.Clinical evaluation found that no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.The complaint was confirmed and the root cause was associated with known risk of device.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this evaluation will be reopened for investigation.Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of the instructions for use found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.A review of the customer provided images revealed apparent blistering at the incision site of two separate patients.According to the complaint description, one implant was removed and can be seen in the images.The implant appears to have been tied with suture into a graft.No relevant supporting clinical information has been provided to assist with a clinical investigation, and the patient's current condition is unknown and the patient impact beyond the reported events could not be determined based on the limited information provided.Therefore, based on insufficient information, a thorough clinical assessment cannot be performed at this time.It was determined the device contributed to the reported event.The complaint was confirmed and the root cause was associated with known risk of device.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIOINDUCTIVE IMPLANT W/ARTH DEL LRG
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, COLLAGEN, ORTHOPAEDICS, REINFORCEMENT OF TENDON
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
150 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
150 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key10932867
MDR Text Key219107994
Report Number3003604053-2020-00158
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OWY
UDI-Device Identifier00885556735664
UDI-Public00885556735664
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K140300
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/20/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/02/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/13/2023
Device Model Number4566
Device Catalogue Number4566
Device Lot NumberA8435
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/13/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-