Model Number 300-20 |
Device Problems
Corroded (1131); Fracture (1260); Mechanical Problem (1384)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 11/17/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was noted that during the scheduled replacement generator, an output current of 2.0ma was the highest current able to be programmed before high impedance and low output current were observed.A deformation in the lead was observed during the generator replacement surgery.The patient was referred for a full revision.A full revision performed on a later date.During the revision, there was a large knot in the suspect lead observed and the lead snapped when trying to remove generator.The lead was revised and impedance was observed to be within normal limits after the replacement surgery.The explanted devices have not been received to date.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Lead lot number and manufacture date were received.The device passed all functional specifications and quality tests and were sterilized prior to distribution.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
The explanted devices were received.Product analysis is being performed.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Generator and lead analysis was performed.Various electrical loads were attached to the pulse generator and results of diagnostic tests demonstrate that accurate resistance measurements were obtained in all instances.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.A break was identified at the ends of both the positive and the negative lead coils.Scanning electron microscopy images of the positive coil show that pitting or electro-etching conditions have occurred at the break location.A secondary broken strand was identified in the vicinity of the coil broken end.Scanning electron microscopy images of the negative coil show that pitting or electro-etching conditions have occurred at the break location.The negative coil show appearance suggesting that a stress-induced fracture (fatigue) has occurred in at least two strands of the quadfilar coil.A kink was observed.The inner silicone tubing was worn out and abraded open at break locations.Note that a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, and therefore an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|