P;/'[manufacturing review: a lot history review, device history record review and complete manufacturing review could not be conducted for the investigation as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: one tri-funnel replacement gastrostomy tube 20f was returned for evaluation.Functional, gross visual and microscopic visual evaluations were performed.The investigation is confirmed for the reported tube dislodgement and the identified split issue, as the balloon was inflated with approximately 20ml of water and after continuously rotating and massaging the balloon, a leak from a split at the top of the balloon became apparent and the water exited the balloon.The investigation is unconfirmed for the reported balloon shrank issue, as there was no permanent material deformation identified in the returned the device and the balloon shrinkage likely occurred due to leakage from the observed split.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|