The reported failure was confirmed through analysis.Visual inspection revealed a small tear intersecting the outer slit on the valve seal.It was also observed that the irrigation flush line was crimped.The device passed functional testing including pressure decay, hemostasis at 5.5 psi pressurization, and aspiration with 10 cc and 60 cc syringes at various flowrates.However, the device did not pass aspiration tests while a shaft surrogate was inserted into the sheath, tipped at slight angles and withdrawn.Device was gently pressurized with 6 psi at the flushing line luer fitting while plugging the distal tip of the catheter.The valve body was then submerged in a beaker of water.A steady stream of bubbles appeared at the valve region.The bubbles appeared to form only at the tear(s) and valve slits.There is no evidence this device was used in a manner inconsistent with the labeled indications.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.
|