|
Model Number 436-28-007 |
Device Problems
Defective Component (2292); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problem
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
Event Date 12/10/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
Second revision surgery - the constrained locking ring failed.Surgeon cemented in a stryker constrained liner and changed head to a 22 mm.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer narrative: the reason for this revision surgery was reported as constrained locking ring failure.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 2 years and 11 months apart.Initial or prolonged hospitalization was required.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There was a ncmr#33617 associated with the main part #436-28-007, liner, acetabular, fmp constrained 28xmp7, which documents that out of 10 parts lot, one parts was rejected and scrapped due to out of dimension.All other item in their respective lot have met with fit, form and functional requirement.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was reported as constrained locking ring failure.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical such as poor bone density, patient bone deterioration, inadequate soft tissue support, patient activities or trauma.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document as soon as it becomes available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reason for this revision surgery was reported as constrained locking ring failure.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 2 years and 11 months apart.Initial or prolonged hospitalization was required.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There was a non-conformance associated with the main part number 497-28-000, head, femoral,cocr 28mm neutral which documents that out of 20 parts lot, one part was rejected and scrapped due to scratches.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was reported as constrained locking ring failure.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical such as poor bone density, patient bone deterioration, inadequate soft tissue support, patient activities or trauma.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document as soon as it becomes available.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|