Two handpieces were returned for evaluation and found to meet product specifications.The manufacturing device history record (dhr) of both products were reviewed.Based on assessment, the products met specifications at the time of their respective release.The two phaco handpiece received for evaluation.A visual assessment of the returned samples found no visual non-conformities.The handpieces were connected to a resistance test box, where its¿ input and output impedance were found to be within specification.The handpieces tuned successfully and completed a five-minute burn-in test with the system set at 100% ultrasonic and torsional power.The handpieces were connected to dynamic tuning fixture (dtf) for stroke length testing on the longitudinal and torsional movements, which found the handpieces to meet manufacturer's specifications per manufacturing test procedure (mtp).The returned handpieces were found to meet specifications.Therefore, the root cause of the reported event cannot be determined conclusively.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4),.
|