COOK ENDOSCOPY MEMORY II DOUBLE LUMEN EXTRACTION BASKET; FFL, DISLODGER, STONE, BASKET, URETHRAL, METAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number MB-35-2X4-8 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse (1254); Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 11/26/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation evaluation: our laboratory evaluation of the products said to be involved confirmed the report.There were two devices returned with the baskets fully retracted.For device #1, our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved confirmed the report.The handle was manipulated and no movement was noted with the basket.The handle was disassembled and it was noted that the drive wire was disconnected from the handle with nesting inside the purple hub.Liquid was also observed in the catheter and an unknown yellow substance was noted on the distal tip of the basket.The drive wire also had a slight bend.For further evaluation of the drive wire cable and basket, the catheter was cut to push the drive wire cable out of the sheath.The basket was fully formed and intact, and evidence of solder was present on the handle cannula at the joint.No other anomalies were detected with the device.For device #2, our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved confirmed the report.The handle was manipulated and no movement was noted with the basket.The handle was disassembled and it was noted that the drive wire was disconnected from the handle with nesting inside the purple hub.For further evaluation of the drive wire cable and basket, the catheter was cut to push the drive wire cable out of the sheath.The basket was fully formed and intact, and evidence of solder was present on the handle cannula at the joint.No other anomalies were detected with the device.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: the report of unable to open the basket was due to a separation of the device in the handle.The cause of the separation is unknown.The instructions for use indicates: "advance device through channel, in short increments, until basket sheath exits endoscope." the instructions for use also states: "confirm desired position of basket sheath relative to target.Advance basket out of sheath.Caution: pulling on sheath while advancing or retracting basket may damage device, rendering it inoperable." basket deployment difficulties and buckling/breaking of the drive wire can occur if the device experiences excessive pressure.Resistance in basket movement and bends in the catheter can occur if the elevator of the endoscope is used to deflect the device at a sharp angle.Prior to distribution, all memory ii double lumen extraction baskets are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
|
Event Description
|
During an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp), the physician used two (2) memory ii double lumen extraction basket.A jf-260v endoscope was inserted into the patient's mouth and cannulation was performed, and another manufacture device was inserted.Then, the device was delivered to the target and the user attempted to open the basket, but the basket did not open at all.Another mb-35-2x4-8 was used but the basket did not open.A competitor's device was used instead and the procedure was completed.Two devices were received for evaluation on 15-dec-2021 where it was determined that the drive wire was disconnected from the handle [subject of the report].A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|