|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Off-Label Use (1494); Naturally Worn (2988)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Tissue Damage (2104); Ambulation Difficulties (2544)
|
Event Date 10/26/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Concomitant medical devices: biomet lot# 105423 cat#443850 na rnglc locking ring sz 23; biomet cup cat#unk lot# unk; stryker stem and head.Medical records/radiographs were provided and reviewed by a health care professional.Review of the available records identified the following: revision surgery d/t wear of articular bearing surface 500-1000 ml of brownish fluid.No abductor attachment to femoral stem and no host bone.'more a rind with in the femur.' all 'devitalized' tissue evacuated.Protrusio noted.Consult w/urology for assessment and left tissue alone for later removal in a supine position or possibly get smaller.Area on trunnion where the cup was rubbing which caused a little bit of erosion on trunnion which could have been a source of metal debris.Cage placed, femoral component remains.Multiple screws placed as well as constrained liner with locking ring.Rom testing shows flexion contracture of 40 degrees with internal rotation to be 20 and external rotation 0.Hip flexion 60 degrees with internal rotation to 30 and external rotation to 20.Estimated that case took 200% additional time due to complexity of the case.A review of the device history records identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing for the liner.A definitive root cause cannot be determined, however, it is possible the use of the competitor's head and the stem could have caused or contributed to the event.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.Multiple mdr reports were filed for this event, please see associated reports: 0001825034 - 2020 - 04182.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported the patient underwent a right total hip arthroplasty.Subsequently, patient was revised approximately 11 years later due to a loose femoral component.The patient has undergone a second revision approximately 15 years later due to recurrent dislocations.Recently, the patient was revised approximately 1 year later due to pain, protrusio, tissue damage and bone loss.It was noted the case took 200 percent additional time due to complexity of the case.No further event information available at the time of this report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|