The ventilator failure described by the user could be reconstructed by means of the logfile analysis.No indications for a device malfunction were found.As further reported, a suction had been used during the reported event.The assumption of the suction being the root cause of the vent failure could be substantiated by logfile analysis: during the case in question, towards the end of the therapy, a fresh gas deficit occurred and the device alarmed repeatedly fresh gas low or leak, pinsp not attained and apnea.Furthermore, negative airway pressures were observed and alarmed accordingly, indicating the usage of a bronchial suction system during use.Following positive and negative pressure peaks were detected, finally leading to a blockade of the ventilator piston.To prevent from damages to the system, the device is designed to shut down automatic ventilation and to alert the user to this condition by means of a corresponding alarm.Manual ventilation and the monitoring functions remain available to the full extent.Dräger finally concludes that the device responded as specified upon the detected negative pressure situation with an autonomous shutdown while changing mode to man/spont (safety mode) accompanied by an audible and visible "ventilator fail" alarm.On site, the device was tested by a service technician and no indications for a device malfunction were found either.The device has been returned to use with no further problems reported.
|