The initial reporter received questionable elecsys rubella igg immunoassay for one patient tested on a cobas 6000 e 601 module compared to an abbott analyzer.The patient was vaccinated on (b)(6) 2020.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient had two samples collected at the same time.For one sample, the customer performed rubella igg testing on an e 601 module, and the patient's result was 5.88 iu/ml non-reactive.The customer sent the other sample to another facility with abbott methodology, and the patient's rubella igg result was 12.7 iu/ml positive.The patient's rubella igg results from (b)(6) 2020 were reported outside the laboratory.The doctor has questioned the discrepant results between the two methodologies used for testing.On (b)(6) 2021, the customer performed repeat testing on one of the samples collected on (b)(6) 2020.The patient's rubella igg result on a different elecsys analyzer was 6.62 iu/ml non-reactive.On (b)(6) 2021, the customer performed repeat testing with the same sample that was tested with abbott methodology.At 10:37, the patient's result on the e 601 module was 5.48 iu/ml non-reactive.At 10:46, the patient's result on a different elecsys analyzer was 6.38 iu/ml non-reactive.The customer confirmed qc was acceptable prior to patient testing on (b)(6) 2020 and (b)(6) 2021.The e 601 serial number was (b)(4).The serial number and specific elecsys analyzer used for repeat testing on (b)(6) 2020 and (b)(6) 2020 was requested but not provided.
|