• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Occlusion (1984); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 09/06/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) #: p100022/s027.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Event Description
Saratzis et al 2019 (zilver ptx) ¿ ¿interwoven nitinol stents versus drug eluting stents in the femoro-popliteal segment: a propensity matched analysis¿.Procedure: a subintimal approach was necessary in 171 (58%) patients.Following plain balloon angioplasty, 136 patients (46%) received a sps and 160 (64%) patients a des (121 a zilver ptx and 39 an eluvia stent).Most patients required implantation of more than one stent: a single stent was used in 175 patients (49%), while 80 (27%) received two stents, 60 (20%) three stents, and 11 (4%) four stents.The decision of whether to use a sps or des was taken intra-operatively, and was operator dependent.83 patients developed a restenosis >50% within the treated f-p segment (primary outcome of interest).Among those 83 patients, 19% of des patients underwent re-intervention, including re-intervention for occlusion.This complaint will capture 30 cases of occlusion requiring reintervention, (19% of 160 des patients=30).This file will capture the potential that this event occurred in the uk and pr319082 will capture the potential that this event occurred in (b)(6).Patient outcome: all patients with a restenosis >50% were discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting.Those who were offered reintervention had deterioration in clinical symptoms (12 individuals) or a decrease in ankle brachial index of =20% (11 individuals).Patient/event info - notes: a total of 296 patients (mean age: 73 years, sd: 11 years, 65% male) met the inclusion criteria; 32% presented with severe claudication (class 3), 22% with rest pain (class 4), 43% with minor tissue loss (class 5), and 2% with severe tissue loss (class 6), as per rutherford classification.A total of 1801 lower limb angioplasties were performed in the department during this period.No patients were excluded because of non-availability of computed tomographic angiogram (cta) at baseline.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: the unknown device of unknown lot number involved in this complaint was implanted in the patient and was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.Document review: as the rpn and lot number of the complaint stents are unknown, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.However, prior to distribution zisv6 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.It should be noted that occlusion is listed as a known potential adverse event within the instructions for use (ifu0117-5).There is no evidence to suggest the user did not follow the ifu.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to patient pre-existing/underlying conditions.From the literature article it is known that patient pre-existing conditions included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, coronary artery disease (cad), renal insufficiency, obesity, history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, history of vascular surgery, history of lower limb amputation and rutherford classifications between 2 and 5.Occlusion is also listed as a known potential adverse event within the ifu and is a common adverse event of endovascular procedures that can be caused by obstruction to the vessel (e.G.During percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) and/or stenting).Summary: complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.Patient outcome is unknown.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Final mdr being submitted due to completion of investigation on 30-sept-21.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Type of Device
NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
MDR Report Key11278952
MDR Text Key233466786
Report Number3001845648-2021-00053
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type literature
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/04/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date09/06/2019
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received01/07/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
-
-