• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES GMBH UNK - CONSTRUCTS: VEPTR; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES GMBH UNK - CONSTRUCTS: VEPTR; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Paralysis (1997); Spinal Cord Injury (2432); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 07/01/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(4).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: mladenov k., et al (2020)management of spinal deformities and tibial pseudarthrosis in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (nf-1),child's nervous system volume 36, pages 2409¿2425 ((b)(6)).This retrospective study aims to present the results and describes our recommendations for the treatment of spinal deformities in pediatric patients with nf-1 based on our long-term experience in the management of these patients.Between 2006 and 2020, the clinical records, radiographs, and other imaging studies of all patients treated for spinal deformities associated with nf-1 were reviewed.Thirty-three patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria.Mean age at index surgery was 9.8 years (range 4.3¿ 16.6 years).A growth-preserving technique (gpt) as a stand-alone procedure was performed as the initial procedure in 11 patients: magnetic controlled growing rods (mcgr) n = 5, vertical expansion prosthetic titanium ribs (veptr) n = 6.The following complications were reported as follows: a case of an (b)(6) year old patient (pt.No 11) underwent revisions 3 times.A case of a (b)(6) year old patient (pt.No 12) underwent revisions 2x veptr.A case of a (b)(6) year old patient (pt.No 14) underwent revision , rib anchor.(due to aseptical loosening of the rib anchors in these cases, revision surgery was necessary.One of the five of the patients needed more than one revision surgery for mechanical issues.) a case of a (b)(6) year old patient (pt.No 18) underwent revision 4 times.A case of a (b)(6) year old patient (pt.No 30) underwent revision with a veptr device.A case of a (b)(6) year old patient (pt.No 31) underwent revision with a veptr device.Fig.7 (case 7) a case of an (b)(6) year-old nf-1 patient with moderate dystrophic scoliosis underwent index procedure comprised of a growth preserving technique by means of vertical expandable titanium ribs (veptr).The curve was well controlled and worsening was prevented for 4 years after initial surgery.During the pubertal growth spurt, significant curve progression occurred.An ¿in situ¿ posterior fusion combined with concave instrumentation was performed at age 13 on further follow-up, the curve increased significantly due to the ¿modulation¿ process of dystrophic alterations the patient developed an incomplete flaccid paraplegia of the lower extremities due to an increase of thoracic kyphosis resulting in anterior compression of the spinal cord.The treatment approach comprised of removal of instrumentation and halo gravity traction for 4 weeks.Followed by posterior and anterior spinal fusion postoperative x-rays showing good deformity correction.Mechanical complications occurred in 12 patients treated with gpt and were mostly due to aseptical loosening of the rib anchors in these cases, revision surgery was necessary.Five of the patients needed more than one revision surgery for mechanical issues.A total of two patients (n = 2) developed neurological symptoms.In the second patient, incomplete lower paraplegia developed 10 years after primary surgery for deformity correction.The deformity was treated by removal of the instrumentation and the application of hgt for a slow correction of kyphosis over 4 weeks followed by anterior and posterior spinal fusion and anterior strut grafting in the same surgical setting.Partial recovery of the paraplegia was observed 6 months after surgery.At latest follow-up, the patient was able to ambulate short distances with a posterior walker.In our series, one patient with cervical kyphosis and instability due to severe dystrophic changes showed delayed union and needed augmentation of the fusion mass.Solid fusion occurred at the latest follow-up.This report is for an unknown synthes vertical expansion prosthetic titanium ribs (veptr).This report is for one (1) unk - constructs: veptr.This is report 7 of 9 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - CONSTRUCTS: VEPTR
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
1302 wright lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key11350845
MDR Text Key242883115
Report Number8030965-2021-01184
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/29/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/19/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/29/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-