Catalog Number 22-4038 |
Device Problems
Failure to Fire (2610); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/08/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a shoulder surgery, 4 sutures were successfully passed through the rotator cuff y using a firstpass.However, when passing the 5th suture, the needle got lodged in the bottom jaw, so the suture could not be passed.It was removed from the patient and it was noticed that the jaw was stuck together making it unable to be used.The procedure was successfully completed using a back up device.It is unknown if there was significant delay.No patient injury or other complications were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10, h3, h6: the reported device, used in treatment, was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was an isolated issue.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.There were no indications that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this evaluation will be reopened for investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: h3, h6: the reported device, used in treatment, was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.A visual inspection of the returned device shows a used device with the needle outside the jaw and suture capture, with a jammed trigger.A functional evaluation was not able to unjam trigger or open the firstpass jaw.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.The complaint was confirmed.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: (1) excessive force (2) tissue thickness (3) damage or debris on the device tip between passes.Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|