• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. BONE ANCHORS 3 W ARTHRO DEL SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, COLLAGEN, ORTHOPAEDICS, REINFORCEMENT OF TENDON

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. BONE ANCHORS 3 W ARTHRO DEL SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, COLLAGEN, ORTHOPAEDICS, REINFORCEMENT OF TENDON Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 72205200
Device Problems No Apparent Adverse Event (3189); Separation Problem (4043)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/16/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a procedure that involved the use of a arthro bioindctive implant 1 large and a bone anchors 3 w arthro del system, the doctor wanted to use the regeneten implant to augment his rotator cuff repair to enhance the quality of the repair and the underlying tendon.The initial loading of the first large implant was very difficult the loading device could not be removed easily and took a lot of strength from the surgeon to remove, then the implants were deployed without any issues and all the tendon staples went in fine, seven tendon staples were put in and went to remove the delivery device, the surgeon dropped his hand towards the arm and pulled gently, instead of releasing the implant it pulled it out with the delivery device, and it was stuck to the delivery device the surgeon had to use quite a bit of force to pull it out, the doctor did not feel the implant was in good enough condition to proceed another attempt was made.As the surgeon did not want to perform a mini-open to use the implant he left the cuff repair without the regeneten augment.This caused a delay of less than 30 minutes.No other complications were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.**note: the arthro bioindctive implant 1 large is reported in report (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: the reported device, used in treatment, was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.A review of the instructions for use found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this evaluation will be reopened for investigation.Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H10: the information received by the manufacturer has been re-evaluated for mdr reporting and it was determined that this case does not meet the threshold for reporting and is a non-reportable event.Additional information received has confirmed there was no failure of the tendon staples, they pulled out along with the implant when the delivery device was being removed.As such no staples were left in the patient and no medical intervention was required.This issue will not contribute to serious injury.If further details are provided confirming the occurrence of a reportable event, our files will be updated accordingly and a further report submitted outlining both the event details and our investigations performed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that patient had a rotator cuff repair surgery.The primary cuff was repaired using a double row arthroscopic technique.The surgeon used two(2) healicoil pk anchors medially and two(2) multifix s anchors laterally.Additionally, the doctor wanted to use the regeneten implant to augment the quality of the repair and the underlying tendon.The initial loading of the first large implant was very difficult as the loading device could not be removed easily and took a lot of strength from the surgeon to remove.Then, the implants were deployed without any issues and all the tendon staples went in fine, seven tendon staples were put in.However, when the surgeon was going to remove the delivery device, the surgeon dropped his hand towards the arm and pulled gently, instead of releasing the implant it pulled it out with the delivery device and the tendon staples.The exact same thing happened again with the next delivery device.As the surgeon did not want to perform a mini-open to use the implant, he decided not to use the regeneten implant.This caused a delay of less than 30 minutes.No other complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BONE ANCHORS 3 W ARTHRO DEL SYSTEM
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, COLLAGEN, ORTHOPAEDICS, REINFORCEMENT OF TENDON
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
150 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
150 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key11448315
MDR Text Key238836911
Report Number3003604053-2021-00076
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OWY
UDI-Device Identifier00885556733479
UDI-Public885556733479
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K140300
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/09/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/01/2022
Device Catalogue Number72205200
Device Lot NumberA8410
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/04/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-