Model Number PDL-M-SP11S |
Device Problems
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
Pain (1994)
|
Event Date 02/11/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The information provided by the reporter indicates the patient came to post-op follow up complaining of back pain.Imaging taken by the surgeon found the pe inlay had dislodged and the superior endplate had migrated anteriorly.There was no indication by the patient or surgeon to indicate how this migration and expulsion had occurred.There was no indication of any patient comorbidities.A removal procedure was scheduled for (b)(6) 2021.No confirmation was provided indicating the procedure went ahead as scheduled.Based on the reported malfunction and surgical intervention an mdr submission is required.Dhr review did not find any issues in manufacturing which may have caused or contributed to this complaint.Review of complaint history found the rate of complaints to be within allowable limits based on the dfmea for prodisc l us.The risk assessment determined inlay expulsion and migration are identified hazards with varying possible harms.The risks associated with this complaint are identified and mitigated.This report is for the prodisc l superior endplate, 1 of 3 submissions total for this event.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient received a prodisc l medium 10mm implant at l5-s1 on (b)(6) 2020.The patient came for the first time to follow up with the surgeon.The patient had back pain starting 1 week prior to the follow up exam with the surgeon.The patient indicated nothing happened when the pain started.The surgeon has not provided a possible reason for the migration or inlay expulsion.There has been no indication the patient has any contributing comorbidities.A removal procedure was scheduled for (b)(6) 2021.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A removal procedure was scheduled for (b)(6) 2021.After the initial report for this mdr, the complaint reporter confirmed the case went ahead as scheduled.The patient was revised using an unknown plate and cage to fuse the level.The explanted prodisc l devices were not retrieved for evaluation.The complaint reporter indicated they were lost by the hospital.This follow-up report is for the prodisc l superior endplate, 1 of 3 submissions total for this event.
|
|
Event Description
|
After the initial mdr report, information was provided which confirmed the removal procedure went ahead as scheduled.The patient was converted to a fusion using an unknown plate and cage.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|