The customer is located in (b)(6) where the meter part number is 54794.As the manufacturer, a similar device part number for the us to report is 54790.Therefore, this report is being submitted to the fda under (b)(4) and the subsequent report to health (b)(6) will reflect 54794.There was no report of patient harm or any intervention required.A device history record (dhr) review has been requested.Nova is requesting additional information, and further details will be provided in a supplemental report.
|
Additional information: b4, g6, h2, h10.An investigation has been initiated and is still pending.Further details will be provided in an additional supplemental report when they become available.
|
Additional information: a1, b4, g3, g6, g8, h2, h4, h6, h10.Udi: (b)(4) the customer reported an incorrect account number shown when scanned by the statstrip (1.86 meter sn (b)(6).This occurred on (b)(6), 2021.The meter scanned a patient identification number as (b)(6) when the actual number was (b)(6).The customer states they are unaware of any patient harm from the barcode misread and will not be returning the meter as it is currently in use at the facility.No materials were returned for investigation and no further evaluation was possible.A device history record (dhr) review for the meter was performed.The review included an assessment of the production, testing, and release of the products.No abnormalities or concerns were observed; the dhr indicated the released product met all specifications.Previously opened and investigated incidents from the customer facility determined the root cause for the patient misreads is attributed to the user facility using poor quality 1d barcodes that were printed using code -39 symbology.Code-39 is no longer industry standard and has a higher substitution failure rate than code-128 and much higher than the standard 2d barcodes available.This failure mode does not represent a systemic issue or a failure of the meter to perform as intended.The failure mode is directly related to the quality of the barcode being generated by the customer.The root cause of the misread is most likely due to poor barcode quality.Based on the original investigation, nova suggested to prevent barcode mis-reads in the future, the customer should change from a 1d to a 2d barcode, which would greatly reduce the chances of a barcode misread.Trending will be monitored for this and or similar complaints.
|