• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CENTINEL SPINE, LLC. PRODISC L PE-INLAY W/ X-RAY MARKER, STERILE, SIZE LARGE, 10MM; PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CENTINEL SPINE, LLC. PRODISC L PE-INLAY W/ X-RAY MARKER, STERILE, SIZE LARGE, 10MM; PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC Back to Search Results
Model Number PDL-L-PT10S
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Expulsion (2933); Migration (4003)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/03/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reporter, follow up conference call, and imaging provided confirmed a complaint that a pdl construct has superior endplate subluxation, pe inlay expulsion, and pe inlay fracture.The patient has been completely asymptomatic despite the malfunction.The current plan is to revise the patient in (b)(6) of 2021.Peer to peer discussion suggests the sup.Endplate angle as well as the keel ap position may be contributing factors in how this malfunction occurred.Patient activities may have been a factor as well, but the patient has no indicated a specific event that may have resulted in the pe inlay expulsion.Revision to angled superior and inferior endplates or alif is likely to occur.Dhr review was completed with no noted issues during manufacturing.The rate of complaints was found to be within allowable limits based on the pocs identified in the risk assessment.Risks were identified in relation to this complaint.There were no indications of any new risks or increases in the pocs.Device evaluation could not be performed as the device remains implanted in the patient as this time.The information provided and the investigation suggest multiple contributing factors to this malfunction.The patient's activities (body building), the superior endplate position, and the superior endplate angle selection were all noted as factors which may have contributed to this malfunction.This submission is for the 3rd of 3 devices involved in the event.
 
Event Description
Patient received a pdl construct at l5-s1 on (b)(6) 2019.Follow up imaging on 5/18/20 show no signs of abnormalities.Images on (b)(6) 2020 found superior endplate subluxation, pe inlay expulsion, and pe inlay fracture with a fragment migrated anterior to s1.Patient has been completely asymptomatic.No medical intervention has been performed as the patient is asymptomatic.Based on a 3/10/2021 conference call with the treating surgeon, the patient will likely be revised in (b)(6) 2021.The patient may be revised with a new pdl construct using angled sup.And inf.Endplates.Alif may be used based on patient activities.This will be determined closer to revision surgery date.No specific date has been scheduled.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated information: the patient underwent revision and removal of the prodisc l devices on (b)(6) 2021.There was no indication of any patient symptoms or complications beyond the reported malfunction.The prodisc l devices were replaced with new prodisc l devices using different angles on the superior and inferior endplates to improve biomechanics.The explanted device was retrieved and sent for third party testing and analysis.The devices are pending analysis.If information is provided that changes the outcome of the complaint investigation or the information in this submission an additional follow up will be submitted.The updated information has not changed the conclusions of the initial investigation into the reported malfunction.This is follow up 1 for 1 of 3 devices involved in this event.
 
Event Description
A patient who previously suffered a prodisc l superior endplate subluxation, pe inlay expulsion, and pe inlay fracture has undergone surgical intervention.The surgical intervention was performed on (b)(6) 2021.The prodisc l construct was removed and replaced with a new prodisc l construct using a pdl-l-sp03 large 3 deg superior endplate, pdl-l-pt10s large 10mm pe inlay, and pdl-l-ip08s large 8 deg inferior endplate.There was still no indication of any patient symptoms or complications beyond the malfunction.The patient was considered asymptomatic.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRODISC L PE-INLAY W/ X-RAY MARKER, STERILE, SIZE LARGE, 10MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
Manufacturer (Section D)
CENTINEL SPINE, LLC.
900 airport rd, suite 3b
west chester PA 19380
MDR Report Key11556509
MDR Text Key243555058
Report Number3007494564-2021-00021
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJO
UDI-Device Identifier00843193111708
UDI-Public00843193111708
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P050010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/11/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/23/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2021
Device Model NumberPDL-L-PT10S
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberH572460
Date Manufacturer Received07/14/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age41 YR
-
-