A full analysis of the data logs has been performed and this analysis concluded that the recalculate function was used following manual adjustments, as expected, but was unsuccessful since manual adjustments were still needed.This is a known software anomaly that will be addressed through our design issues management process.The user had the possibility to undo the result to get back to his previous manual adjustments performed instead of restarting the merge from scratch.Unique identifier (udi) #: (b)(4).
|
The clinical representative (cr) was present for an seeg case.During the case, cr loaded in an airo ct ('airo pre') after placing fiducials for registration.After placing electrodes, two scans were taken post-operative before and after disconnecting the rosa to confirm placement accuracy ('airo post' and 'airo post2').'airo post' cut off part of the patient¿s head in the scan, which is why a 2nd postoperative scan was taken after disconnecting the rosa.All 3 scans were merged to the preoperative ct, but did not merge accurately using the automatic merge and had to be manually adjusted and recalculated.Even after recalculating, all scans were manually adjusted to further improve accuracy.Delay to case about 5 mins, no patient impact, patient was already under anesthesia and after first incision.
|