This report is for an unknown implant.Part and lot number are unknown.Without the specific part number; the udi number, 510-k number and manufacturing site name are unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/ investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
This file is a review of the following journal article: peters, k., et al (2018) a comparison of permanent anchors versus biodegradable anchors and tacks for arthroscopic shoulder stabilization.Techniques in shoulder & elbow surgery, vol.19, pages 1-7, (australia).The study emphasizes on the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability using knotless devices made from 4 different materials.The patients evaluated on course of this study: 155 patients.The article describes the following procedure: arthroscopic shoulder stabilization.The device involved was: unknown bioknotless anchor.Complications described: the overall redislocation rate was 19% in the bioknotless group.Revision surgery for redislocation was performed in 10% in the bioknotless group.Intraoperatively, 1 inserter tip broke off in the bioknotless group.
|