• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA CANADA CORP. PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA CANADA CORP. PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number PVS25
Device Problem Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse (1254)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/15/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2021, a perceval implant attempt occurred.As reported, during the collapsing phase, the outflow ring of the perceval valve did not fit into the plastic sheath of the holder after several attempts.The valve was therefore not properly mounted onto the holder.After several attempts, the outflow ring was inserted into the sheath of the holder only for a couple of millimeters, and the valve stent was evidently not uniformly collapsed (in some places it protruded towards the outside).The surgeon decided to try to implant the valve anyway (even if not properly collapsed) but as soon as the holder crossed the aortotomy the valve's outflow ring snapped out of the sheath so the valve could not be properly implanted.All the members of the or staff tried to collapse the valve with two different sterile collapsing kits, but no one succeeded.After various attempts, a new perceval l valve was collapsed with the second accessory kit opened with no trouble.The new perceval l size was successfully collapsed at the first attempt.The procedure was delayed of 30min as informed (patient still in cross-clamp).The patient remained stable during the procedure, with a normal postoperative course.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The valve pvs 25/l sn (b)(6) was returned to livanova for evaluation.The accessory kits used in the procedure were not returned for investigation.However, in the case history it was indicated that the collapsing difficulty of this valve also occurred with a second accessory kit.This second kit was also used to successfully collapse and implant a second valve of the same size.For this reason, even if a potential involvement of the accessories can never be completely excluded, there are reasonably indications to focus the investigation on the valve rather than on the accessories.After decontamination with formalin treatment, a visual inspection of the valve was performed to verify the compliance of the prosthesis with the specifications required at the time of manufacture and release.The results of the visual inspection did not highlight the presence of any macroscopic anomalies and/or pre-existing defects according to the specifications.Then, in order to allow an exhaustive evaluation of the functional behavior, a replication of collapsing procedure was performed.The returned valve was collapsed using a demo accessory kit in order to attempt to replicate the reported event.No problems were encountered positioning the returned valve and during the collapsing phase.Furthermore, the manufacturing and material records for the perceval heart valve, model #icv1210, s/n # (b)(6) , as they pertain to the reported event, were retrieved and reviewed by quality engineering at livanova.The results confirmed that this valve satisfied all material, visual, and performance standards required for a (model #icv1210) perceval heart valve at the time of manufacture and release.Based on the performed analyses, the reported event cannot be explained by any factor intrinsic in the involved device because it was not possible to reproduce the claimed collapsing difficulties.The accessories used in the field were not returned, so it is not possible to totally exclude their potential involvement even if they were used to collapse a second valve without problems.Based on livanova experience with previous similar cases, it is not possible to exclude that the reported experience could be related to a wrong positioning of the perceval valve in the dual collapser.In particular this could lead to an incomplete reduction in diameter on the outflow side of the valve and a consequent partial coverage by the transparent plastic tube.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
TISSUE HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA CANADA CORP.
5005 north fraser way
burnaby
MDR Report Key11579957
MDR Text Key252327982
Report Number1718850-2021-01044
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00896208000436
UDI-Public(01)00896208000436(240)ICV1210(17)231027
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/27/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/27/2023
Device Model NumberPVS25
Device Catalogue NumberICV1210
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/24/2021
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date03/31/2021
Device Age16 MO
Date Manufacturer Received04/30/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient Weight110
-
-