|
Model Number 436-28-000 |
Device Problem
Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problem
Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
Event Date 03/11/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer narrative: additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document as soon as it becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
2nd revision surgery due to revised an onkos proximinal femur.The locking ring was locked, but there was a dislocation, a new product styled proximal body was installed.Doctor felt the newer body would solve the issue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer narrative: the reason for this revision surgery was reported as dislocation.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 10 days apart.Initial or prolonged hospitalization was required.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the products that may have contributed to the reported event.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this compliant was a revision surgery due to dislocation.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.Due to short time between previous and revision surgery, it is possible that the event may have occurred due to lack of post-operative care, patient noncompliance with medical instructions, improper surgical technique, patient activities or trauma.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document as soon as it becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
Second revision surgery - revised an onkos proximal femur.The locking ring was locked, but there was a dislocation, a new product styled proximal body was installed.Surgeon felt the newer body would solve the issue.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|