The device was not returned for evaluation; it was discarded at the hospital.Without return of the unit it is not possible to determine if some damage or defect existed on the unit that could have contributed to the event.It is not known if some procedural factors may have contributed to the event.No corrective actions will be taken at this time.Lot number was not provided; therefore, review of the manufacturing records could not be completed.An investigation has been initiated to consider any potential manufacturing factors that may have contributed to this complaint.Invasive procedures involve some patient risks.Although serious complications are relatively uncommon, the physician is advised, before deciding to insert or use the catheter, to consider the potential benefits in relation to the possible complications.The techniques for insertion, methods of using the catheter to obtain patient data information, and the occurrence of complications is well described in the literature.In this case, leakage occurred in a pediatric patient, who would have a lower threshold for brief interruptions in therapy.It is unknown whether user or procedural factors contributed to the stated event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|
Although this complaint was not confirmed by a non-conformance as the product was not returned for evaluation, another complaint with a similar system of interlumen leak came from the same reporter.Therefore, this complaint is part of a pra and capa to investigate interlumen leakage.
|