Investigation summary: based on the information available, there was no device available for analysis and there was no report of a device performance allegation during treatment.The reported urinary retention is a known risk associated with sling procedures and is/are noted as such in the device instructions for use.Device history record (dhr) a dhr and ship history review cannot be performed as the lot number was not available.Device technical analysis: the device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.Labeling review: the delivery device instructions for use (ifu) was reviewed.The patient symptom urinary retention was found to be listed in the ifu.Investigation conclusion: based on the information available, a conclusion code of known inherit risk of device was assigned to this investigation.
|
It was reported that the patient had a sling device implanted in a different facility about 12 weeks ago.The patient has been struggling with retention and wanted to have this relieved.The patient was prepared for the surgery and after thoroughly evaluating the patients coaptation through cystoscope it was determined that releasing one of the advance xp arms should relieve the patient's urinary retention.Prior to going under anesthesia, the patient was having to self catheter.During surgery, the patient had a catheter placed and suction was used to drain the bladder as well.In the procedure, it was identified that the sling was not placed high enough in the triangle and could not give the proper support to the urethra, so the left arm of the sling was incised and released from the mesh connected to the urethra.The patient is fully recovered.
|