• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC UNK - PEEK IMPLANT; PLATE, CRANIOPLASTY, PREFORMED, NONALTERABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC UNK - PEEK IMPLANT; PLATE, CRANIOPLASTY, PREFORMED, NONALTERABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK - PEEK IMPLANT
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Impaired Healing (2378)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.This report is for an unknown peek implant/ unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/ investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: lai jb, et al (2011), computer-assisted designed and computer-assisted manufactured polyetheretherketone prosthesis for complex fronto-orbito-temporal defect, j oral maxillofac surg, volume 69, pages 1175-1180, (usa).The purpose of this case presentation is to show the success to which the computer-assisted designed (cad) and computer-assisted manufactured (cam) polyetheretherketone (peek) prosthesis is used to reconstruct a traumatic fronto-orbito-temporal defect.A (b)(6) year-old caucasian male was referred for reconstruction of the left fronto-orbito-temporal defect measuring 109 cm2 after a motor vehicle collision about 2 months earlier.He underwent emergent left frontal craniotomy for the evacuation of the left frontal intracerebral hematoma and placement of left frontal ventriculostomy with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt.Due to the comminution of the fracture, the bones were unsalvageable for reconstruction.A preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (ct) was obtained and the images were then delivered to the manufacturer (synthes maxillofacial).A nonsterile prefabricated peek implant was delivered and sterilized at the hospital facility by heat sterilization.6 weeks later, the patient underwent surgery and was implanted with the unknown synthes peek optima-lt patient-specific implant.The implant was checked for fit and contoured using a high-speed competitor¿s drill with a cutting burr to accommodate the ventriculoperitoneal shunt.The implant was then secured with an unknown synthes 2.0-mm titanium miniplates and screws.Platelet-rich plasma was applied over the implant and surrounding areas before scalp closure to facilitate soft tissue healing.Symmetry of the fronto-orbito-temporal region with the uninjured side was achieved.The patient was followed for 6 months without wound dehiscence and other complications.At 7 months postop ration, the patient developed skin breakdown and fluid leakage over the left fronto-cranial implant due to over drainage from the left frontal ventriculoperitoneal low-pressure shunt.A ct without contrast showed over drainage of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt with fluid collection beneath the implant.Wound exploration, evacuation of the epidural fluid, and revision of the shunt with a medium-pressure valve proved successful.The patient did well and the skin healed uneventfully.This report is for the unknown synthes peek optima-lt patient-specific implant, unknown synthes 2.0-mm titanium miniplates and screws.This complaint involves three (3) devices.These impacted products capture the reported (b)(6) year-old male patient who developed skin breakdown and fluid leakage over the left fronto-cranial implant due to over drainage from the left frontal ventriculoperitoneal low-pressure shunt at 7 months postoperatively.This report is for one (1) unk - peek implant.This report is 1 of 3 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - PEEK IMPLANT
Type of Device
PLATE, CRANIOPLASTY, PREFORMED, NONALTERABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
1302 wright lane east
west chester, PA 
MDR Report Key11671014
MDR Text Key261247869
Report Number2939274-2021-01849
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GXN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSN
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/19/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/15/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK - PEEK IMPLANT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/19/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
-
-