First evaluation: production process: a review of the dhr demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to apifix specifications.Patient information : based on the distributer information the removal surgery was performed due to an infection.Corrective action: following the 2019 post market surveliance report (dms- (b)(4)), the company decided to open capa (b)(4) to address an increase in late infection complaints.As part of the capa the company: performed a vast literature search to identify the late infection rate reported in the literature (dms-(b)(4)).Investigated production lots associated with late infection.The compared antibiotic protocol used between centers.Received consultation by an infection specialist.The capa investigation did not identify a manufacturing problem with implants used in patients that developed a late infection and the late infection rate noted was within the rate reported in the literature.The company did however identify that sites applying vancomycin powder before wound closure have a significantly lower rate of late infection complaints.The use of vancomycin powder was also supported by the infection specialist consultation (dms-(b)(4)) the company communicated these findings of applying vancomycin powder before wound closure to the surgeons (dms-(b)(4)) and is continuing to follow the rate of late infection complaints.Risk assessment: late-onset infection is a known risk that was assessed and recorded by the product risk assessment dms-(b)(4) rev q hazard id 21.5 this complaint does not change the occurrences rate.We assume that in the present case vancomycin was not applied.The total rate of late infection is 3.96% (n=20).Of them, only 1 cases was when vancomycin was applied which is 0.2% (1/505).The rate is well within the literature (0.2%-12.5% ,cer 727 rev t).The company is continuing to monitor late-infection complaints.
|