Initial medwatch submitted to the fda on 28/apr/2021.After multiple attempts to gather more information from the reporter, no additional information has been received.A review of the device labeling notes the following: the current overstitch¿ endoscopic suturing system (ess) instructions for use (ifu) addressed the known and potential event of "other-clinical outcome device related" as follows: warnings: only physicians possessing sufficient skill and experience in similar or the same techniques should perform endoscopic procedures.Users should be familiar with surgical procedures and techniques involving absorbable sutures before employing synthetic absorbable sutures for wound closure, as the risk of wound dehiscence may vary with the site of application and the suture material used.Ensure that there is sufficient space for the needle to open.Warning: do not introduce the device with the needle body in its open position.Adverse event: possible complications that may result from using the endoscopic suturing system include, but may not be limited to: pharyngitis / sore throat.Nausea and / or vomiting.Abdominal pain and / or bloating.Hemorrhage.Hematoma.Conversion to laparoscopic or open procedure.Stricture.Infection / sepsis.Pharyngeal, colonic and/or esophageal perforation.Esophageal, colonic and/or pharyngeal laceration.Intra-abdominal (hollow or solid) visceral injury.Aspiration.Wound dehiscence.Acute inflammatory tissue reaction.
|
Medical information review of literature: effectiveness of combination endoscopic therapy for colonic anastomotic leaks.Author: thiruvengadam, nr.Et al.Abstract: background colonic anastomotic leaks are associated with significant morbidity and mortality.Whereas small case series suggest that fully covered self-expandable metal stents (fcsems) are effective, no larger studies have examined the impact of combination endoscopic therapy on colonic anastomotic leaks.Methods our retrospective cohort study reviewed 51 patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for colonic anastomotic leaks between 2011 and 2018.Patients receiving combination therapy involving fcsems plus local closure (n = 24) were compared with patients receiving fcsems alone (n = 18) or endoscopic suturing alone (n = 9).The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success (resolution of leak, removal of percutaneous drains, avoidance of surgical reoperation, and reversal of temporary diversion).Results clinical success was achieved in 55% of patients.Clinical success was achieved in 18/24 patients (75%) with combination therapy compared with 6/18 patients receiving fcsems alone (33%, adjusted risk ratio [rr] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [ci] 1.10 - 4.24; p = 0.02) and 4 /9 patients undergoing endoscopic suturing alone (44%, rr1.91, 95 %ci 0.84 - 4.31; p = 0.10).Stent migration occurred in 40% of patients.Conclusions this large series demonstrates that combination therapy was associated with a higher rate of clinical success, and future prospective studies are warranted.
|