• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARTHROSURFACE, INC. ARTHROSURFACE TOEMOTION; ARTHROSURFACE® TOTAL TOE - PROXIMAL PHALANX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARTHROSURFACE, INC. ARTHROSURFACE TOEMOTION; ARTHROSURFACE® TOTAL TOE - PROXIMAL PHALANX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure (3023)
Patient Problems Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The root cause was unable to be determined as necessary information to adequately investigate the reported event was not provided.Since no part and lot information was provided, review of the device history records (dhrs) of devices in question cannot be conducted.The instructions for use (ifu) document states that this type of event can occur, and all risks are addressed in the risk documentation.Several factors such as stress/ physical loads on the implants, vascularity of the implantation site, surgical techniques employed during implantation, patient factors (such as age, current state of the immune system, bone quality, and sensitivity to device materials), and patient post-op compliance to rehabilitation procedures etc., can have impact on the functional effectiveness of the implanted devices.The implant materials and combinations have decades of history for use in joint replacement applications.Also, the implant materials have been evaluated for biocompatibility to demonstrate safety for intended purposes.Arthrosurface reached out to the patient and provided referral surgeons that have experience with toemotion implants for further evaluation of her toe joint.If additional relevant information is received, information will be reviewed, and complaint file will be amended accordingly.
 
Event Description
Patient reached out to arthrosurface via website to report joint pain and stiffness she is experiencing since receiving the toemotion implant in (b)(6) 2019.There was range of motion initially but the joint remained stiff most of the time.Physical therapy and bending of the joint of the did not help.Patient was told by her current podiatrist that the joint failed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARTHROSURFACE TOEMOTION
Type of Device
ARTHROSURFACE® TOTAL TOE - PROXIMAL PHALANX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARTHROSURFACE, INC.
28 forge parkway
franklin MA 02038
Manufacturer (Section G)
PRIMO MEDICAL GROUP
75 mill st
stoughton MA 02072
Manufacturer Contact
phani puppala
28 forge parkway
franklin, MA 02038
5085203003
MDR Report Key11759824
MDR Text Key248414488
Report Number3004154314-2021-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K132496
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/13/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/03/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Date Manufacturer Received04/13/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age59 YR
-
-