• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EPOCAL INC. EPOC READER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EPOCAL INC. EPOC READER Back to Search Results
Model Number HR-1002-00-00
Device Problem Non Reproducible Results (4029)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 04/01/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer stated that repeat testing was performed to confirm correct results which met the clinical picture.The customer's complaint of low po2 results with card lot # 01-21041-20 will be investigated by looking at in-house data, finished goods testing, lifetime testing, retain testing and a search to see if there are any other complaints on this same card lot.The cause of this event is unknown.
 
Event Description
The customer reported a discrepant low po2 result on the epoc reader when compared to an rp 500 instrument.There was no report of injury due to this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Siemens has completed the investigation: the cause of the alleged discrepancies could not be identified from the information provided by the customer.A review of the in-house performance for the card lot used, lot 01-21041-20, did not identify any product deficiencies.In addition, there were no other complaints received on card lot 01-21041-20.Therefore, there is no further evidence that the system or reagent cards are not performing as intended.The bias noted at the customer site could be due to the cumulative effect of multiple causes: different sample draws and delays between collection and analysis are known to affect test results if proper precautions are not considered.Given the sample draws were different for epoc and rp500, and the collection times are unknown, these cannot be ruled out as contributing factors.Additionally, the epoc and rp500 tests were not performed side-by-side, and there was 1 hour delay between tests.It is possible there were changes to the patient's condition during this time.There can be differences in bias between different instruments/platforms.It was noted that qc did not pass on epoc at the customer site, and incorrect rilibak ranges were used.If the customer is concerned on lot performance, it is recommended the customer perform valid qc procedures prior to blood testing.According to clsi c46-a blood gas and ph analysis and related measurements; approved guideline, it is recommended that blood gas measurements for the purpose of evaluating the gas exchange function of the lungs (po2 and pco2) should be performed on arterial blood only.Furthermore, the guideline indicates that in cases where "arterialized" capillary blood may be the only practical alternative to arterial blood, the blood gas results should be interpreted cautiously.In addition to sample inadequacies, the process of capillary collection may change po2 levels significantly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EPOC READER
Type of Device
EPOC
Manufacturer (Section D)
EPOCAL INC.
2060 walkley road
ottawa, ontario K1G 3 P5
CA  K1G 3P5
MDR Report Key11761211
MDR Text Key248547320
Report Number3002637618-2021-00030
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CGL
UDI-Device Identifier00809708016685
UDI-Public00809708016685
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K113726
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/20/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/03/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberHR-1002-00-00
Device Catalogue Number10736398
Date Manufacturer Received05/10/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-