• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. MI Z HANDLE ACET REAMER; PROSTHESIS, HIP, HEMI-, TRUNNION-BEARING, FEMORAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. MI Z HANDLE ACET REAMER; PROSTHESIS, HIP, HEMI-, TRUNNION-BEARING, FEMORAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 71364073
Device Problem Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problems Laceration(s) (1946); Tissue Breakdown (2681)
Event Date 12/23/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that, during an anterior left tha performed on (b)(6) 2020, a 58mm reamer failed and sized up.The failure caused dramatic external rotation of the reaming device, leading to eccentric reaming of the socket rather than concentric reaming and causing injuries to the patient.No back-up instrument was available at the moment due non-functioning autoclave machine, and the staff was forced to use straight 66mm reamer, causing the capsule to be mispositioned.No other complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
D1: brand name added.D4: expiration date and udi added.H4: manufacture date added.(b)(4).D4: catalog number and lot number updated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device, used in treatment, was returned for evaluation.The mi z handle acetabular reamer became non-functional due to the fracture of one of the clevis in the reamer shaft confirmed by a visual inspection.The clevis most likely fractured by the initiation and subsequent propagation of fatigue cracking.The fatigue cracking eventually propagated to an extent that the clevis could not bear the imposed torsional loading, which lead to a fracture.Fatigue cracking is caused by the reamer bearing cyclic (i.E.Repeated) stresses in excess of the material endurance limit for an extended period of time.Only the inner portion of the device was returned.None of the other pieces of the device was returned for evaluation.A lab analysis confirms as received components shown in attached photos depicts two segments of the acetabular reamer.Attached photos in report show the fractured surface of the pin geometry of the distal section of the acetabular reamer.The electron microscope images of the fracture surface are in the attached photos in the report.The pin housing failure could have been due to repeated cyclic high load initiating crack and over time fracturing.The edx (energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy) report generated from the fracture surface indicates the device was manufactured according to the internal specification and the device failure could have been initiated by repeated overloading the device beyond its design strength of the material.A medical investigation was conducted and confirms it was reported during an anterior left tha performed on 23-dec-2020, a 58mm reamer failed and sized up.The failure caused dramatic external rotation of the reaming device, leading to eccentric reaming of the socket rather than concentric reaming and causing injuries to the patient.No back-up instrument was available at the moment due non-functioning autoclave machine, and the staff was forced to use straight 66mm reamer, causing the capsule to be mispositioned.The operative report was not provided.The patient had a revision 27 days post implantation and it is noted the device is not available for return.Conclusion: without the operative report and return of the device, the root cause of the reported event could not be definitively concluded, although a user/procedural variance could not be ruled out as a potential contributing factor to the reported eccentric reaming.It is the o.R.Staff and surgeon responsibility to ensure that back-up instruments are available prior to the surgical procedure.The patient impact beyond the reported eccentric reaming of the socket and subsequent revision cannot be determined.A complaint history review found related failures; this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries; damage from repeated use can occur.Expected wear/tear is likely the probable cause of the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaints will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for these complaints; however we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MI Z HANDLE ACET REAMER
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, HEMI-, TRUNNION-BEARING, FEMORAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
MDR Report Key11821887
MDR Text Key250589155
Report Number1020279-2021-04270
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDH
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K123598
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/22/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/13/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number71364073
Device Lot Number16FM06374
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/10/2021
Date Manufacturer Received10/21/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-