• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND VENA SEAL CLOSURE SYSTEM; AGENT, OCCLUDING, VASCULAR, PERMANENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND VENA SEAL CLOSURE SYSTEM; AGENT, OCCLUDING, VASCULAR, PERMANENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SP-101
Device Problem Biocompatibility (2886)
Patient Problem Anaphylactic Shock (1703)
Event Date 05/11/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Physician used venaseal for patient treatment for the great saphenous vein (gsv).It is unknown if it was the left or right, but it was venous.Only one leg was treated.Ifu was followed and the device was prepped without issue.The patient was administered antibiotics prior to the procedure.No sedation (precede) was used.0.1cc of local anesthesia (xylocaine) was applied at the insertion site.The location of the catheter tip prior to initial delivery of adhesive was periphery 5 cm from sfj.There was no compression of the gsv.During the treatment, immediately after the injection, about 4-5 minutes after the start of treatment (3rd aliquot), the patient complained of itching in the upper body.Treatment was continued and the fourth aliquot was delivered, symptoms such as blood pressure, decreased saturation, redness, and urticaria appeared.Blood pressure decreased from 110/61 to 84/48 due to the appearance of symptoms such as redness.The patient¿s pulse increased from 60 to 90.Oxygen was increased to 5l/min.Anaphylaxis was suspected.The treatment was discontinued and subcutaneous injection of bosmin was administered.Adrenal hormones (solmedrol) were also administered intravenously.The patient was transferred to another hospital and hospitalized overnight and discharged the following day.It is reported the event was not caused by the product.The cause of the anaphylactic shock is not identified.The physician believes it is not caused by venaseal as the adhesive is still left in the patient's leg; however, it is unknown to confirm if the venaseal was a cause.It is suspected it may be other medications such as local anesthesia (xylocaine), pethidine or antibiotics administered before the surgery.The patient is no longer on steroid but has no further symptoms.10 cm of the vein was treated.The patient was hospitalized for one night and discharged the following day after the procedure.No further injury reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENA SEAL CLOSURE SYSTEM
Type of Device
AGENT, OCCLUDING, VASCULAR, PERMANENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708734
MDR Report Key11875700
MDR Text Key252365558
Report Number9612164-2021-02052
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PJQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P140018
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/25/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/25/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2022
Device Catalogue NumberSP-101
Device Lot Number61616
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/11/2021
Date Device Manufactured11/03/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
-
-