• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 14B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 14B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number LXMC14
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
Patient Problems Pyrosis/Heartburn (1883); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 05/18/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date of event: unknown, captured as awareness date.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventive action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Photo was provided for review by ethicon medical safety officer.Following are their observations: "i reviewed a photograph of a computer screen showing an ap and lateral plain abdominal xray of the patient referred to in this complaint.There were 2 images from the (b)(6) 2021 which showed a discontinuous linx device as evident by a c-shape and absence of the expected annular appearance".Hands on analysis of the affected device is needed to establish the mechanism/cause of failure.The dhr for lot 17192 was reviewed.No ncs, defects, or reworks related to the product complaint were found.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? when and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis?.
 
Event Description
It was reported there was a patient with a possible discontinuous device.No further information was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 6/28/2021.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? experiencing gerd.What was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.You have provided this already.Was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? yes.Were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? not to our knowledge.Did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? yes, on (b)(6) 2018 for back issues but states he told them it had to be the 1.5 tesla.Did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? the patient had a cholecystectomy on (b)(6) 2018 and more recent the patient underwent spine surgery.The patient had to have f/u films as part of the f/u from spine surgery and on (b)(6), there is clear radiographic documentation that his device has opened up and is in a ¿c-shape¿.Was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? we would like to remove the device and replace it.The patient is reluctant to have surgery again.The patient stated that he would reach out to us when he is ready to proceed.When and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? yes.When and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? yes.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 14B
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
MDR Report Key11939196
MDR Text Key257572745
Report Number3008766073-2021-00108
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005349
UDI-Public00855106005349
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/18/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/04/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/08/2021
Device Model NumberLXMC14
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC14
Device Lot Number17192
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/28/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? Yes
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-