• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. UNKN GENESIS II TOTAL KNEE TIB INSERT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. UNKN GENESIS II TOTAL KNEE TIB INSERT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKN01200120
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problems Fall (1848); Failure of Implant (1924); Joint Laxity (4526)
Event Date 06/11/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that, after a tka, a genesis ii insert snapped off.A revision surgery was performed on an unknown date to treat this adverse event.A hi flex tibial insert was changed.The patient was not injured beyond the described event.No other complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per complaint details, the patient required an insert revision due to instability ¿after a fall¿.Reportedly, the hf poly tibial insert was found to have the post snapped off; therefore, it was replaced with a new poly.Responses to the requested clinical documentation had not been received as of the date of this medical investigation.Without the requested medical documentation, the root cause of the reported event could not be fully assessed; however, it was reported that the instability occurred ¿after a fall¿.The patient impact beyond the reported fall, subsequent instability, and revision with findings of a fractured post could not be determined.No further medical assessment could be rendered at this time.Should additional clinically relevant documentation become available the medical investigation task may be re-evaluated.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Some potential probable causes for this event could include but are not limited to traumatic injury, abnormal loading of limb or excessive forces applied to implant.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device confirmed the stated failure mode.The device's post component was broken off.The post was returned with the rest of the device.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that per complaint details, the patient required an insert revision due to instability ¿after a fall¿.Reportedly, the hf poly tibial insert was found to have the post snapped off; therefore, it was replaced with a new poly.Responses to the requested clinical documentation had not been received as of the date of this medical investigation.Without the requested medical documentation, the root cause of the reported event could not be fully assessed; however, it was reported that the instability occurred ¿after a fall¿.The patient impact beyond the reported fall, subsequent instability, and revision with findings of a fractured post could not be determined.No further medical assessment could be rendered at this time.Should additional clinically relevant documentation become available the medical investigation task may be re-evaluated.The contribution of the device to the reported event could be corroborated.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, patient anatomy, or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKN GENESIS II TOTAL KNEE TIB INSERT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key12063780
MDR Text Key258358011
Report Number1020279-2021-05443
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/24/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKN01200120
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/07/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/29/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-