• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Device Problems Material Integrity Problem (2978); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Stroke/CVA (1770); Stenosis (2263); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 09/12/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Cbas® heparin surface incorporates cbas-heparin manufactured from heparin sodium api, which is covalently bound to the device surface and is essentially non-eluting.A list of baseline characteristics for the complications group has been provided in the article.No patient specific details have been provided.Therefore, the patient initials reflect the w.L.Gore internal case number.The mean age of the 54 included patients was stated to be 71.5 years.The article states that 37 of the 57 patients were male.The date of incident is unknown.Therefore, the date the article was published online was used.
 
Event Description
The following publication was reviewed: ¿long-term outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair using chimney grafts for aortic arch pathologies: 10 years of single-center experience¿ (wael ahmad et.Al, annals of vascular surgery, 2021, published online september 12, 2020).This retrospective, single-center study reports the early- and long-term outcomes of the thoracic endovascular aortic repair using the chimney-graft technique (chtevar) for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies between january 2010 and december 2019.Aortic arch repair with a chtevar was performed in 54 patients.Specifically, 13 chtevar patients received a cg in the lcca (proximal landing zone i), 1 patient in the brachiocephalic trunk (bct), and 38 patients received 2 cgs for the lcca and the bct (proximal landing zone 0).Additional 2 patients received a cg in the left subclavian artery.The ctag was used as the main aortic stent graft in all patients.An gore® excluder® aaa iliac limb was used as a cg in the bct; a gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis (n = 50) or a advanta v12® (n = 3) as a cg in the lcca (n=51) or in the left subclavian artery (n=2).The performed chtevar procedure is described in the article: the 10-15% oversized covered stent ¿ either an advanta v12® or gore® viabahn® endoprostheses was introduced through the left common carotid artery (lcca) into the ascending aorta and a gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis iliac leg was introduced via the brachiocephalic likewise into the ascending aorta.Similarly, a conformable gore® tag® thoracic endoprosthesis (ctag) was simultaneously introduced via the femoral approach until the proximal landing zone (0 or 1) was reached.The ctag was oversized between 20-30% for an aorta with degenerative aneurysm and 10% for a dissected aorta.The chimneys were introduced slightly deeper into the ascending aorta than the ctag, with an overlapping length of 3-5cm.The ctag was deployed, directly followed by the deployment of the chimney grafts, which was completed by balloon modeling.The article considers the advanta v12®, gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis and gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis as chimney-grafts (cg).Among others, the following adverse events were reported in the article for early postoperative outcomes: 6 patients had permanent neurological deficit including a major stroke.Of patients who developed stroke 5 patients had two cgs for bct and lcca and one patient had cg for lcca.It was stated that 2 patients had permanent neurological deficit including paraplegia.No patient specific information regarding the reported events and interventions was provided in the article.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The author provided individual patient information (included case complication, age, gender, co-morbidities) related to the reported adverse events within the article.Therefore, individual cases have been created and have bee reported on for the mentioned viabahn devices.This duplicate report 2017233-2021-02129 is being retracted.The reported ¿neurological deficit including a major stroke¿ in the article are reflected in the following gore complaints/ medwatch reports: mpdcase-(b)(4) ¿ mw# 2017233-2021-02267.Mpdcase-(b)(4) - mw# 2017233-2021-02266.Mpdcase-(b)(4) - mw# 2017233-2021-02265.Mpdcase-(b)(4) - mw# 2017233-2021-02264.Mpdcase-(b)(4) - mw# 2017233-2021-02263.Mpdcase-(b)(4) - mw# 2017233-2021-02262.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff AZ 86004
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL ECHO RIDGE B/P
3250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
jörg kersten
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff, AZ 86004
9285263030
MDR Report Key12106623
MDR Text Key259595812
Report Number2017233-2021-02129
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P040037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/14/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/02/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/03/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-