• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_LASSO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_LASSO Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_LASSO
Device Problem Entrapment of Device (1212)
Patient Problems Rupture (2208); Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4451)
Event Date 12/31/2006
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's ref.No : (b)(4).No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was provided by the customer.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Biosense webster report number: 2029046-2021-01110 is related to the same incident.
 
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source.The following complications were reported in this publication: it was reported that a (b)(6) year old man with a history of recurrent symptomatic episodes of paroxysmal af underwent pv isolation and left atrial circumferential ablation with the lasso circular mapping catheter and ablation catheter and during the ablation confirmation procedure, catheter movement was met by severe resistance.Based on the previous experience, surgery was undertaken immediately.Left atrial exploration revealed the catheter was severely entangled within the lateral commissure of the mv.A chorda rupture at the middle portion of the anterior mv leaflet (a2) and tearing of the p1 scallop resulted in significant mv regurgitation.Multiple monofilament sutures for the p1 scallop repair and new chorda formation for the a2 portion were followed by implantation of a 28-mm carpentier-edward ring.Intraoperative tee showed trace mitral regurgitation.Serial echocardiograms showed the minimal mitral regurgitation to be durable and the patient remained in normal sinus rhythm during follow-up.Model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected device is lasso.Other biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: none.Non-biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: aesop 3000 and 28-mm carpentier-edward ring.Publication details: title: minimally invasive surgical release of entrapped mapping catheter in the mitral valve.Objective: two cases of catheter entrapment in the mitral valve, which is a rare complication of pulmonary vein isolation, were successfully treated via robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.Methods: review of 2 cases of entrapment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK_LASSO
Type of Device
UNK
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
31 technology drive, suite 200
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
gabriel alfageme
31 technology drive
irvine 92618
949789-868
MDR Report Key12163435
MDR Text Key261432886
Report Number2029046-2021-01111
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/25/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/13/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_LASSO
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/25/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age48 YR
-
-