The reported event was confirmed cause unknown.1 sample was confirmed to exhibit the reported failure.The device had not met specifications.The product was not used for treatment.Visual evaluation of the returned sample noted one opened (without original packaging), used irrigation bulb syringe.Visual inspection of the sample noted that there was a strand of hair between the barrel and the bulb on the return sample.This does not meet the specification "no hair is permitted on the product.A review of the device history record did not show any problems or conditions that would have contributed to the reported issue.The investigation is concluded, and no additional action is required at this time.The device history record was reviewed and found nothing that could have caused or contributed to the reported event.A labeling review was not performed because labelling could not have prevented the reported failure.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the actual/suspected device was inspected.
|