• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA APOLLO; ANESTHESIA UNITS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA APOLLO; ANESTHESIA UNITS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8606500
Device Problems Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071); Fire (1245); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/20/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation has just started; results will be provided in a follow-up report.
 
Event Description
During a case at approximately 8:00 am fire was observed at the expiratory port under the apl valve.Additionally, it was observed that the device was not reading vt or pressure on the display prior to the expiratory flow sensor igniting.There was no patient injury reported.The patient was immediately disconnected and manually ventilated.The unit was swapped out and ventilation was not interrupted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The electronic logfile as well as the breathing system in question were available for investigation.Based on the logfile analysis, no indications for a product malfunction as root cause for the reported fire were found.There was no flow sensor malfunction detected during the ventilation.Thus, it could be assumed that the heat wires were still intact when the ignition occurred.However, it was found that the measured values were clearly too low initially and later not longer available.This leads to the assumption that there was a foreign body in the sensor cuvette leading to shading of the measuring wires.Also the sent image material as well as the inspection of the returned components revealed that the flow sensor has been the origin of the inflammation.Based on the found damages, it was concluded that a foreign body had entered the flow sensor from the patient side, as it would have had to move against the flow direction otherwise.However, there were no indications for a possible foreign body found due to the flame exposure.Since no usable residues were found, the type and origin of the foreign flammable material could not be finally determined.During normal operation, the risk of fire due to a flammable breathing gas mixture (oxygen in combination with volatile anesthetics) streaming through the flow sensor is not given.Due to the safety factor inherent in the design and the thus limited ignition energy due to the contributed electrical power, the probability is zero.In the case different flammable substances as e.G.Ethanol or nebulized drugs are present within the flow sensor, especially during the self-cleaning procedure of the flow sensor, an ignition or deflagration cannot be totally excluded.Self-cleaning procedure is only performed after a coldstart of the device during the boot up sequence prior to the power-on self-test.In the case of an ignition, an expansion of the fire beyond the flow sensor itself can be nearly excluded due to the flame-retardant characteristics of the adjacent materials.The instructions for use of the device contains an appropriate warning: to prevent a fire hazard, drugs or other substances based on inflammable solvents, such as alcohol, must not be introduced into the patient system.Adequate ventilation must be ensured if highly inflammable substances are used for disinfection.Additionally, the instructions for use of the device and the spirolog flow sensor informs about adequate reprocessing procedures e.G.For the breathing system components and the flow sensor.It is recommended to reprocess the breathing system components at least weekly for the case bacterial filters are used.The case was considered as single event, there were no similar cases reported within the last three years.
 
Event Description
During a case at approximately 8:00 am fire was observed at the expiratory port under the apl valve.Additionally, it was observed that the device was not reading vt or pressure on the display prior to the expiratory flow sensor igniting.There was no patient injury reported.The patient was immediately disconnected and manually ventilated.The unit was swapped out and ventilation was not interrupted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Due to a technical issue with our internal emdr system we submitted for the form fda 3500a an incorrect value for the field h3.- not returned to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
During a case at approximately 8:00 am fire was observed at the expiratory port under the apl valve.Additionally, it was observed that the device was not reading vt or pressure on the display prior to the expiratory flow sensor igniting.There was no patient injury reported.The patient was immediately disconnected and manually ventilated.The unit was swapped out and ventilation was not interrupted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APOLLO
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA UNITS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM   23542
MDR Report Key12243886
MDR Text Key266010122
Report Number9611500-2021-00323
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/29/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8606500
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/09/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/31/2009
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
NA.; NA.; NA.
-
-