• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TELEFLEX MEDICAL HUDSON BITE-GARD MOLAR BITE BLOCK; ENDOSCOPIC BITE BLOCK

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TELEFLEX MEDICAL HUDSON BITE-GARD MOLAR BITE BLOCK; ENDOSCOPIC BITE BLOCK Back to Search Results
Model Number IPN049847
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem Laceration(s) (1946)
Event Date 07/01/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn# (b)(4).Complaint verification testing could not be performed as no sample was returned for analysis.A device history record review could not be conducted as the lot number provided for this complaint (901549) does not correspond to the product reported by the customer; it is not a valid lot number for the manufacturing facility.Without the device to evaluate, the complaint could not be confirmed and the probable cause could not be determined from the available information.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for reports of this nature.If the sample becomes available at a later date a follow up report will be submitted with investigation results.
 
Event Description
It was reported "patient has a brain injury and bites lips & mouth.Facility placed the bite guard-i confirmed that it was not secured and was in place continuously.Upon performing routine oral care, the cn found the "bite block was in the middle of his mouth not aligned with his teeth.When she moved the bite block, she saw that the green bite block piece was gone, no longer connected to the handle.The supervisor came in to assist along with rt.They got a lateral xr of the neck and could see it at the back of the throat.As they opened the patient's mouth the green piece was visualized, and they said that it was moving up and down with each breath.When they could visualize it, they were able to remove the foreign object with forceps.Patient has had some bleeding in the mouth.The patient was sent to er for evaluation of any trauma after the foreign body was removed.Bronchoscope was utilized to visualize the posterior oropharynx.The patient had a small area of erythema".
 
Event Description
It was reported "patient has a brain injury and bites lips & mouth.Facility placed the bite guard-i confirmed that it was not secured and was in place continuously.Upon performing routine oral care, the cn found the "bite block was in the middle of his mouth not aligned with his teeth.When she moved the bite block, she saw that the green bite block piece was gone, no longer connected to the handle.The supervisor came in to assist along with rt.They got a lateral xr of the neck and could see it at the back of the throat.As they opened the patient's mouth the green piece was visualized, and they said that it was moving up and down with each breath.When they could visualize it, they were able to remove the foreign object with forceps.Patient has had some bleeding in the mouth.The patient was sent to er for evaluation of any trauma after the foreign body was removed.Bronchoscope was utilized to visualize the posterior oropharynx.The patient had a small area of erythema".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn#(b)(4).The sample was returned and sent to the manufacturing site for evaluation.The manufacturing site reports: "a visual inspection of the product involved in the complaint was performed on a sample received by the customer of product code 1140 (bite-gard molar bite block).The customer description states, "upon performing routine oral care, the cn found the "bite block was in the middle of his mouth not aligned with his teeth.When she moved the bite block, she saw that the green bite block piece was gone, no longer connected to the handle.)"; the customer complaint is confirmed since the components handle and block of the sample are separated as is describe in customer complaint description.While performing the visual inspection test on the received sample a wear on the handle was observed which is related to a correct bonding of the bite block.Based on the received sample of product 1140 (bite-gard molar bite block) provided by the customer, a disconnection between the handle and the bite block is confirmed, however based on the received sample is not possible to determine that the issue was caused by an inappropriate assembly (bonding).".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HUDSON BITE-GARD MOLAR BITE BLOCK
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC BITE BLOCK
Manufacturer (Section D)
TELEFLEX MEDICAL
morrisville NC
MDR Report Key12287575
MDR Text Key265378592
Report Number3004365956-2021-00250
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MNK
UDI-Device Identifier14026704640352
UDI-Public14026704640352
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/16/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/06/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberIPN049847
Device Catalogue Number1140
Device Lot Number901549
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/26/2021
Date Manufacturer Received08/17/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
N/A.; N/A.
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
-
-