• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 10MM ARCH; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 10MM ARCH; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 211-D
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/26/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The healthcare professional reported that during the pulserider-assisted procedure with the target lesion being a bifurcating anterior communicating artery (acom) aneurysm with severe vessel tortuosity at the proximal region, the pulserider t, 3mm, 10 mm arch aneurysm neck reconstruction device (anrd) (211d / 3051697717) did not orientate / position as the physician intended.Torque was applied and the pulserider anrd was retracted many times, but it did not position well.It was reported that the pulserider anrd fully deployed outside the lesion twice.It appeared to be twisted at the body and leg part when it deployed the second time.The physician stopped using the pulserider anrd.It was reported that the procedure was completed ¿by making y-stent¿ with two 21mm neuroform atlas stents (stryker).There was no report of any patient adverse event / complication.The complaint device is reported as not available to be returned for evaluation and analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.The name, phone and email address of the initial reporter are not available / reported.[conclusion]: the healthcare professional reported that during the pulserider-assisted procedure with the target lesion being a bifurcating anterior communicating artery (acom) aneurysm with severe vessel tortuosity at the proximal region, the pulserider t, 3mm, 10 mm arch aneurysm neck reconstruction device (anrd) (211d / 3051697717) did not orientate / position as the physician intended.Torque was applied and the pulserider anrd was retracted many times, but it did not position well.It was reported that the pulserider anrd fully deployed outside the lesion twice.It appeared to be twisted at the body and leg part when it deployed the second time.The physician stopped using the pulserider anrd.It was reported that the procedure was completed ¿by making y-stent¿ with two 21mm neuroform atlas stents (stryker).There was no report of any patient adverse event / complication.The complaint device is reported as not available to be returned for evaluation and analysis.Based on complaint information, the device was not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (3051697717) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the information provided in the complaint and without the product available for analysis, the reported issues by the customer cannot be confirmed.Based on the review of the manufacturing documentation, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and without the return of the complaint sample; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation / interaction, aneurysm size / vessel characteristics, device selection, and the concomitant microcatheter, may have contributed to the reported issue.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to include the additional event information received on (b)(6) 2021.[additional information]: the healthcare professional reported that during the pulserider-assisted procedure with the target lesion being a bifurcating anterior communicating artery (acom) aneurysm with severe vessel tortuosity at the proximal region, the pulserider t, 3mm, 10 mm arch aneurysm neck reconstruction device (anrd) (211d / 3051697717) did not orientate / position as the physician intended.Torque was applied and the pulserider anrd was retracted many times, but it did not position well.It was reported that the pulserider anrd fully deployed outside the lesion twice.It appeared to be twisted at the body and leg part when it deployed the second time.The physician stopped using the pulserider anrd.It was reported that the procedure was completed ¿by making y-stent¿ with two 21mm neuroform atlas stents (stryker).There was no report of any patient adverse event / complication.The complaint device is reported as not available to be returned for evaluation and analysis.On (b)(6) 2021, additional information was received.The information confirmed that the procedure was targeting a bifurcating anterior communicating artery (acom).It is unknown if the delivery wire and the microcatheter were gently pulled back until the excess slack was removed and the tip of the microcatheter began to move.The pulserider device was removed.It is unknown if the device or concomitant devices appeared damaged.Repositioning was needed and the implant was retracted within the microcatheter.The device could not be torqued as intended, and as a result, the physician gave up trying to use the device and the device was removed from the patient.The microcatheter was not removed with the pulserider device.(b)(6), the manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 10MM ARCH
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
MDR Report Key12321023
MDR Text Key280688542
Report Number3008114965-2021-00360
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
UDI-Device Identifier00859030005130
UDI-Public00859030005130
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
H160002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/26/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/13/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2024
Device Model Number211-D
Device Catalogue Number211D
Device Lot Number3051697717
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/16/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
PULSERIDER ACCESSORY CABLES
-
-