• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG EVIA DR-T; PACEMAKER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG EVIA DR-T; PACEMAKER Back to Search Results
Model Number 359529
Device Problems Premature Elective Replacement Indicator (1483); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/30/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Device explanted.Device stated there was an error other than battery depletion and to perform a memory dump and contact biotronik.Ram dump is attached for analysis.The clinician stated the device is eri and they were bringing in patient monthly to check for eri.No adverse patient events were reported.Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was received and analyzed.Prior to the analysis of the device, the manufacturing process for this pacemaker was re-investigated and all production steps were performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process.Particularly the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.Upon receipt, the device was interrogated showing an alert on the programming device as mentioned in the complaint description.The eri battery status was triggered on (b)(6) 2021.The memory content of the device was thoroughly analyzed.The battery voltage and current consumption were found to be normal and as expected.The analysis further showed that a large amount of home monitoring transmission retries were documented in the device data, which can lead to a temporary increase of current consumption and a noticeable decrease of time to eri.In general, the current consumption of the device is influenced by different factors, which may lead to noticeable changes of tte indication.Such factors are, for instance, changes in lead impedance values or the programmed parameters, a prolonged follow-up session or even a large amount of hm transmission retries.The amount of charge taken from the battery was verified.The battery condition was found to be normal and as expected.After eri activation, the battery voltage temporarily recovered to a value above the eri threshold.This does not represent a battery malfunction but results in a displayed message during interrogation.Next, the pacemaker was subjected to an electrical analysis.The ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.In summary, the pacemaker was fully functional.The battery condition was found to be normal and as expected.The analysis did not reveal any sign of a material or manufacturing problem.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIA DR-T
Type of Device
PACEMAKER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin 12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key12323893
MDR Text Key266603053
Report Number1028232-2021-04610
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NVZ
UDI-Device Identifier04035479101312
UDI-Public04035479101312
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P950037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/16/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number359529
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/17/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/28/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age66 YR
-
-