• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CENTINEL SPINE, LLC. INFERIOR END PLATE MEDIUM 0-STERILE; PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CENTINEL SPINE, LLC. INFERIOR END PLATE MEDIUM 0-STERILE; PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC Back to Search Results
Model Number PDL-M-IP00S
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Off-Label Use (1494); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem Loss of Range of Motion (2032)
Event Date 07/27/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The surgeon inserted the pe inlay into the endplates without following the indicated surgical technique form prodisc l.The distractor was not used to progress the inlay into place and open the disc space.The inlay was pushed and mallet into place using only the inlay pusher.The surgeon thought the inlay was seated, but once the inserter was removed he realized the inlay was not properly seated.The surgeon could not re-attach the inserter to fully seat the inlay.It was at this point the surgeon decided that the best course of action was to remove the pe inlay and close the patient with the endplate intact.The patient appeared to have restored disc height and the endplates were positioned well enough for the surgeon to feel confident the surgery was a success from a neurological standpoint.The surgeon indicated directly that there was no problem with the implants or instruments used during the procedure, and this event was solely due the surgical technique used.There has been no indication of a scheduled revision procedure and the patient has been doing fine.Dhr review did not find any problems during manufacturing which may have contributed to the complaint.Complaint history determined the rate of complaints is within allowable limits indicated in the risk assessment.The risk assessment identified multiple risks related to this complaint.No devices were returned for evaluation.The endplates remain implanted in the patient.The information provided by the reporter indicates this complaint was caused by the surgeon's surgical technique.The pe inlay was inserted without the use of the distractor as indicated in the prodisc l surgical technique guide.This submission is for 1 of 3 devices involved in this event.
 
Event Description
A patient was scheduled and diagnosed for prodisc l implantation at l5-s1.The patient underwent implantation surgery on (b)(6) 2021.During the procedure, the access surgeon provided a limited window to the vertebral level.The spine surgeon prepared the disc space and inserted the prodisc l endplates into the disc space.The surgeon then proceeded to place the pe inlay into the endplates without following the indicated surgical technique form prodisc l.The distractor was not used to progress the inlay into place and open the disc space.The inlay was pushed and mallet into place using only the inlay pusher.The surgeon thought the inlay was seated, but once the inserter was removed he realized the inlay was not properly seated.The surgeon could not re-attach the inserter to fully seat the inlay.It was at this point the surgeon decided that the best course of action was to remove the pe inlay and close the patient with the endplate intact.The patient appeared to have restored disc height and the endplates were positioned well enough for the surgeon to feel confident the surgery was a success from a neurological standpoint.The surgeon indicated directly that there was no problem with the implants or instruments used during the procedure, and this event was solely due the surgical technique used.The surgeon has not scheduled any additional intervention.The patient woke from surgery happy with positive results.The patient was sent home the same day of the procedure.The surgeon is closely monitoring this patient.As of (b)(6) 2021, the patient is doing fine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFERIOR END PLATE MEDIUM 0-STERILE
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
Manufacturer (Section D)
CENTINEL SPINE, LLC.
900 airport rd, suite 3b
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
HAMMILL MANUFACTURING COMPANY
360 tomahawk drive
maumee OH 43537
Manufacturer Contact
jason smith
900 airport rd, suite 3b
west chester, PA 19380
4848878810
MDR Report Key12337982
MDR Text Key267117801
Report Number3007494564-2021-00073
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJO
UDI-Device Identifier00843193111753
UDI-Public00843193111753
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P050010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/16/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/18/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPDL-M-IP00S
Device Lot Number2020-1441
Date Manufacturer Received07/27/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/02/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age50 YR
-
-